Warhammer Feeds

The best Warhammer Online news & blogs in one place

0 Vote

Scream loud and you will be heared

  • Monday Feb 8,2010 02:45 PM
  • By zizlak
  • In Uncategorized

It’s good to hear that Mythic is planning to re-think the plans of streamlining the scenario-structure.

They should now analyze why some scenarios are fun and some just aren’t fun in any way. Just to name one example ..Thunder Valley.. I can’t remember anyone liking this scenario. It’s just too much running around and to few fighting going on. This scenarios could be called a small-scale city siege experience…just boring ;)

What I would like to keep is the separation between several zones in T4. So a different set of scenarios for various stages of the campaign of a pairing. At least to me this give scenarios some sort of variety and connection to the ORvR campaign.

If this is going to be cut, then the scenarios should not contribute anything to the campaign. Maybe they shouldn’t contribute anything anyways.

One thing I really wish they would enable would be a sort of separation between pug’s and premades. I don’t think that I’m alone there. Of course there would be people who would like to crush pug’s and get easy renown, but I think that the majority wants competition and fights where they get the feeling of accomplishing something. Otherwise the city” fights” wouldn’t be so hated ;)

  • Read the original post on
  • Similar posts (automatically generated):

      None Found


    Like us!

    Friends

    Do you want to get into beta testing of the hottest new game releases, such as Diablo III and SWTOR?

    Webmasters

    Get Chitika | Premium

    About

    WarhammerFeeds.com is an aggregator of the best Warhammer news sites and blogs!

    Spread the word

    • Put one of our badges on your site to proudly show your visitors you're listed!
      View all badges...

    More gaming feeds